Друзья и коллеги!
Рады сообщить вам о результах нашего нового научного исследования, только что опубликованного в США ведущим профессиональным актуарным журналом:
Gavrilov L.A., Gavrilova N.S.
Mortality measurement at advanced ages:
A study of the Social Security Administration Death Master File. North American Actuarial Journal, 2011, 15(3): 432-447.
Полный текст статьи можно прочитать здесь:
http://longevity-science.org/pdf/Mortality-NAAJ-2011.pdfВопросы и комментарии приветствуются (см. ниже) !
С наилучшими пожеланиями,
-- Леонид и Наталья----------------------------------------
---------
===================================
P.S.: Призыв к добровольцам перевести этот текст на русский язык:--
Dear Friends and Colleagues,
We are pleased to share with you the results of our new study, just published by a professional, peer-reviewed
North American Actuarial Journal:
Gavrilov L.A., Gavrilova N.S.
Mortality measurement at advanced ages:
A study of the Social Security Administration Death Master File. North American Actuarial Journal, 2011, 15(3): 432-447.
Full text is available online at:
http://longevity-science.org/pdf/Mortality-NAAJ-2011.pdfThis article refutes a common belief in old-age mortality deceleration, mortality leveling-off, and mortality plateaus in humans. This new published study has passed the scrutiny of independent evaluation by three anonymous experts-reviewers, before our manuscript was accepted for publication. The whole process took two years, and the final article addressed all suggestions made by the reviewers So, there are good reasons to be confident in these new peer-reviewed findings.
Here is the abstract of new article:
AbstractAccurate estimates of mortality at advanced ages are essential to improving forecasts of mortality and the population size of the oldest old age group. However, estimation of hazard rates at extremely old ages poses serious challenges to researchers:
(1) The observed mortality deceleration may be at least partially an artifact of mixing different birth cohorts with different mortality (heterogeneity effect);
(2) standard assumptions of hazard rate estimates may be invalid when risk of death is extremely high at old ages and
(3) ages of very old people may be exaggerated.
One way of obtaining estimates of mortality at extreme ages is to pool together international records of persons surviving to extreme ages with subsequent efforts of strict age validation. This approach helps researchers to resolve the third of the above-mentioned problems but does not resolve the first two problems because of inevitable data heterogeneity when data for people belonging to different birth cohorts and countries are pooled together.
In this paper we propose an alternative approach, which gives an opportunity to resolve the first two problems by compiling data for more homogeneous single-year birth cohorts with hazard rates measured at narrow (monthly) age intervals. Possible ways of resolving the third problem of hazard rate estimation are elaborated.
This approach is based on data from the Social Security Administration Death Master File (DMF). Some birth cohorts covered by DMF could be studied by the method of extinct generations. Availability of month of birth and month of death information provides a unique opportunity to obtain hazard rate estimates for every month of age. Study of several single-year extinct birth cohorts shows that mortality trajectory at advanced ages follows the Gompertz law up to the ages 102–105 years without a noticeable deceleration.
Earlier reports of mortality deceleration (deviation of mortality from the Gompertz law) at ages below 100 appear to be artifacts of mixing together several birth cohorts with different mortality levels and using cross-sectional instead of cohort data. Age exaggeration and crude assumptions applied to mortality estimates at advanced ages may also contribute to mortality underestimation at very advanced ages.
========================================
Keywords:
Old-age mortality, mortality measurement, advanced ages, North American Actuarial Journal, Social Security Administration Death Master File, old-age mortality deceleration, mortality leveling-off, mortality plateaus, heterogeneity birth cohorts, old people, age exaggeration, extinct generations, Gompertz law, mortality underestimation, mortality laws, Gompertz-Makeham law, mortality at advanced ages, mortality forecasting
Comments and suggestions are most welcome!
To read and post comments, click hereBest wishes,
-- Leonid and Natalia
----------------------------------------
---------
-- Leonid Gavrilov, Ph.D., GSA Fellow
-- Natalia Gavrilova, Ph.D., GSA Fellow
Center on Aging, NORC at the University of Chicago
Website:
http://longevity-science.org/Blog:
http://longevity-science.blogspot.com/Our books:
http://longevity-science.org/Books.htmlHome:
Longevity Science Blogand
New Study on Old-Age Mortality, Survival and LongevityShorter weblink:
http://tinyurl.com/No-Mortality-Deceleration----------------------------------------
--------------
Спасибо за ваш вопрос!
Чтобы прояснить ситуацию мы вставили следующее разъяснение в основной текст нашего поста:
Суть открытия:- Опровергнута 70-летняя догма о замедлении темпов роста смертности людей с возрастом после 80 лет.
- Доказано, что экспоненциальный рост интенсивности смертности с возрастом (закон Гомпертца) продолжается и после 80 летнего возраста, по крайней мере до 106 лет.
- Обнаруженные закономерности требуют пересмотра существующих теорий старения и перспектив продления жизни.
----------------------------------------
-----
.![[info]](http://l-stat.livejournal.com/img/userinfo.gif?v=92.1){kind=small}
